51茶馆

Series of complaints from members of BACM complaining that the vote on the transfer had not been taken in a manner which satisfied section 100(1)(b) of the 1992 Act. Complaints alleged Act had been breached by a letter sent by the union鈥檚 President to members at the time of the vote. Complaints dismissed. President鈥檚 letter was circulated separately from the voting paper. Also letter did not constitute 鈥渋nterference or constraint鈥� on members entitled to vote (section 99; section 100C).